ENERGY / OIL & GAS

Deferment starts in the permit queue.

Permits, deferment coding, turnaround scope, and integrity backlogs leak barrels and budget when they stall. 009 works those queues inside your network.

YOUR PERIMETER · zero data egress
PERMIT FLOW REQUEST PERMIT-TO-WORK CONFLICT CHECK SIMOPS RISK REVIEW READ + PREPARE AUTHORIZATION GATED DEFERMENT STRIP CHOKE 42% INTEGRITY 18% SIMOPS 11% WEATHER 7% MISC / OTHER 5% VOLUME BY CAUSE CODE · MISCODING FLAGGED FOR REVIEW INTEGRITY BACKLOG IOW APPROACHING ROUTE TO ENG BASIS ATTACHED

Your operating landscape

Built around the systems your teams already use.

Recon reads the records behind your operation, then shows where work slows, repeats, or waits for a decision.

SAP PM and Maximo

Notifications, work orders, asset registers

PI historians

Process data, tags, trends

ePTW platforms

Permits, isolations, SIMOPS boards

Hydrocarbon allocation systems

Production accounting, deferment records

Integrity and anomaly registers

RBI programs, IOW excursions, FFS queue

MOC and HSE case systems

Change requests, approvals, actions

WHERE THE HOURS GO

Arguing cause codes on the morning deferment call instead of causes.

Walking permit packs between requester, area authority, and issuing authority.

Challenging TAR scope items after the freeze, when challenge is expensive.

Aging the anomaly register toward its integrity windows faster than review clears it.

What gets agentified

Screening management-of-change requests for completeness and affected documents

MOC Screener checks each change request against the procedure, identifies the drawings, HSE cases, and procedures it touches, and routes it with the impact list attached

Verifying daily production allocation against meter and well test data

Allocation Checker reconciles allocated volumes against source measurements and flags the wells and meters where the balance does not close

What Recon maps.

RECON maps Permit cycle time by type and by asset Deferment volume by cause code, with miscoding identified Turnaround scope items against history of growth after freeze Anomaly register aging against integrity operating windows Workover candidate queue and selection basis Cost per administrative transaction around the barrel

Agents designed for your operation.

01

Permit Reviewer

READ + PREPARE · APPROVAL GATED

Checks each permit request for completeness, isolations, and SIMOPS conflicts against the live permit board, and prepares the authorization package. The permit authority approves; the agent never authorizes work.

02

Deferment Analyst

READ + REPORT

Reads daily deferment records against cause codes and well history, corrects miscoded entries for review, and produces the loss picture your production engineers currently assemble by hand.

03

Turnaround Scoper

READ + PROPOSE

Screens proposed scope items against inspection findings, anomaly severity, and history from previous events, and prepares the challenge list before the scope freeze rather than after the growth.

04

Integrity Backlog Agent

READ + ROUTE

Ranks the anomaly register against integrity operating windows and remaining-life calculations already in your systems, and routes items approaching their window to the responsible engineer.

05

MOC Screener

READ + ROUTE · APPROVAL GATED

Reads each change request, assembles the affected-document set, and holds safety-critical changes at the gate for the technical authority with the impact analysis prepared.

06

Allocation Checker

READ + REPORT

Runs the daily balance between allocation, metering, and well tests, and reports the specific closure gaps your hydrocarbon accountants currently find at month end.

What this sector asks first.

Does the agent ever authorize work?

No. Authorization steps are structurally gated to the named permit authority. The agent prepares the package, surfaces conflicts, and records the decision once a person makes it.

Our data sits across a historian, a CMMS, and spreadsheets. Is that a blocker?

That situation is normal for this sector and it is what Recon is for. The Agent Twin reads the systems where they are, and the fragmentation itself usually shows up in the baseline as measurable cost.

Can this run in a joint-venture environment with strict data boundaries?

Deployment sits inside whichever perimeter owns the data, egress is zero, and access scopes are set per system during Phase 0, which gives JV partners a verifiable answer rather than an assurance.

We are moving data to an OSDU-aligned platform. Does that change the approach?

No. Recon reads your systems wherever they are in that migration, and the operational mapping it builds becomes cleaner as sources consolidate. The deployment follows your data architecture rather than imposing one.

Turnarounds are contractor-heavy. Can agents work contractor records?

Contractor systems enter scope through the same Phase 0 access plan; where access is not granted, Recon measures around the gap and the baseline states the blind spot explicitly, which is itself useful in the contract conversation.

Adjacent sectors

Recon states your process losses in barrels.

Recon runs read-only and ends with the simulated case for your specific processes.

GET STARTED